Official Community Plan Comments
The following comments were adopted unanimously at the F.S.V.C.A.
general meeting on October 2, 1999:
The members of the Association wish to
thank the Fernie Ski Hill management for allowing them a voice in the
creation of the area Official Community Plan and for being responsive
to our concerns. While we believe most of these concerns will be dealt
with satisfactorily, we feel it is important to highlight the key points:
- Vision - The draft OCP speaks of a vision of the
hallmark mountain lodges of the West and while this is fine it does
omit any vision of the existing and emerging residential community that
is also a very real part of the area. The majority of both full and
part time residents on the ski hill came to the area seeking a measure
of wilderness beauty and rural tranquility. We would like to see a statement
that future developments would promote a more natural than urban atmosphere,
with forested green spaces, natural settings for trails, creeks and
drainages where ever possible and increased set backs to promote a more
open and green subdivision.
- Traffic - The Timberline Crescent residents are
very concerned about the possibility of having large volumes of traffic
from the new subdivision flowing through our residential crescent. In
addition to residents of the new subdivision, the potential exists for
day use traffic passing through our neighborhood on the way to either
the parking lots or the people mover lift. We are willing to have an
emergency access road that is normally blocked in some fashion, but
consider open access to be unacceptable. The ski hill management has
agreed with this position and it is reflected in the OCP, but we have
heard rumours that the Ministry of Transportation and Highways is pushing
for open access. We wish to reaffirm that we would oppose such a move
strenuously. Another access route directly from the highway to the new
subdivision, bypassing the existing subdivisions, would be very desirable.
- Ski Hill Road Intersection - The OCP identifies
a problem with traffic exiting the ski hill area on busy days. We would
like to stress that this problem is indeed becoming serious and remediation
efforts are needed sooner, rather than later.
- Trails - The recreational use of motorized vehicles
should be banned on the trails within the residential areas.
- Carrying capacity - The head count numbers in the
OCP appear low to us given the loadings we have seen in the past, but
we have been assured that utility services, parking and traffic designs
will in fact meet the actual loads. We accept that but would ask that
the actual loadings be monitored carefully so any potential problems
are identified early.
- In fill lots - These lots were not in the original
prospectus and are on land that the purchasers of neighboring lots were
assured were unbuildable due to the steep slopes. In some cases there
neighboring lots were priced higher because of their isolation and neighboring
forest lots. These owners are understandably upset by the apparent change
in rules and violation of the original prospectus. In addition the introduction
of in fill lots could have a negative impact on subdivision property
values and reduce the available green space. The Association supports
these owners and shares their concerns and would therefore like to see
these lots dropped from the OCP.
- Prospectus enforcement - While design guidelines
were established for the Highline subdivision, the Association does
not feel they were well enforced during the development stage. The ski
hill management has acknowledged this and vows to have a better system
in place for future developments, which would include reviews by development
professionals for compliance with the guidelines and consideration of
how well adjacent designs compliment each other and the neighborhood
as a whole. The Association strongly supports these plans and encourages
diligence in their implementation.
- Construction Impact - During construction all efforts
should be made to minimize the noise, dust, traffic and other impacts
on the existing residents.
|